General DiscussionWho would win?

There's no way that the pro player would win 100% of the time, but it would be higher than the other "5 competent players."

Only answer.

First

Pros can lead anchor players on what to do

obviously the latter

9k plus 4 2k equal to 17k
4k times 5 equal to 20k
Ofc the latter will win
Quick maff

im pretty sure our canadian boi can just pick a manly hell demon and buy battlefury to get 983 gpm and win

I would say 60% against pro player. Yes, He Will own his lane, but other 2 lanes Will be overwhelmingly Lost. As well no vision, no map control, no stacks. Will probably lose some towers early.

As well, if other team knows about matchup, they can trilane him to try to cripple him, as other lanes Will still do fine against archons. They can somehow coordinate, while coordinating ppl with only Basic understanding of game would ve Close to impossible.

it is possible if the pro goes mid and snowballs incredibly fast . (say meepo). he wouldnt need his 4 other players

the pro player would get fed on 4ks, but the 4ks would get fed on the 2ks
there could be snowball in both teams

Pretty sure the pro player just picks some autistic 1v5 hero like Meepo/storm/ta/sf and then tells his pub allies to try not to feed while he solo carries. Seen it happen enough in my pubs to know that big skill differences are very exploitable by good players.

https://www.dotabuff.com/matches/1680762040

I'm far from a pro but when I played games with my friends who were new to dota shit like this happened 80% of the time. Dota is a really abusable game if you are better than everyone else in it and you pick appropriately.

this topics are the reason why dotabuff is shit.

What if the legend and ancient players used to party as 5 and they trilaned the pro player to make them less useful

archons are the best they can win without pros any way

Edit: 3v5

^^^these*

rtz will carry the game